March 24, 2025
March 24, 2025

For healthcare provider organizations, Drug Enforcement Administration regulations are not only complex and often difficult to understand but violating these regulations can lead to multi-million-dollar settlements. In addition, a DEA audit or inspection can lead to criminal prosecution and administrative action against your DEA registration if the agency finds violations of the Controlled Substances Act. And if an entity is a member of a larger organization, DEA may inspect other locations within that health system to investigate practices throughout the organization.
In this article, we’ll outline some of the top DEA regulations your organization should know. We’ll also discuss recent DEA settlements related to those regulations. The settlements underscore the serious consequences of noncompliance. Further, the subsequent findings highlight where you and your organization are most at risk. To help you strengthen your organization’s compliance related to DEA regulations, we have included action plans to help you avoid fines, negative press, and the possibility of loss of licensure for personnel and entities.
Title 21 CFR Part 1305.05 indicates a Registrant may authorize one or more individuals to issue orders for a Schedule II controlled substance on the Registrant’s behalf by executing a POA for each such individual. The Code of Federal Regulations indicates that POA must be available for inspection together with other order records.
The POA must be executed by:
A POA may be signed electronically, by any or all the persons required to sign. A registrant may revoke any POA at any time by executing a notice of revocation. POAs must be revoked by the person who signed the most recent application for DEA registration or reregistration and two witnesses.
$412,500 fine—February 2021: “DEA contended that MedMark [Treatment Centers of Texas Inc.] was in violation of recordkeeping provisions, including failing to maintain complete and accurate records, failing to maintain a current power of attorney, and failing to keep its records in a readily retrievable manner.”
DEA’s Pharmacist’s Manual (2022 edition) indicates if a breakage or spillage is clearly observed, but the controlled substances are not recoverable, the Registrant should document the circumstances of the event in his or her records.
It is DEA’s position that in order to maintain complete and accurate records in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.21(a), non-recoverable breakage or spillage must be recorded on a DEA Form 41 and, as with any other form of disposal under 21 CFR Part 1317, should be signed by two individuals who can testify that a breakage or spillage occurred. Except, destruction of a controlled substance dispensed by a practitioner for immediate administration at the practitioner's registered location, when the substance is not fully exhausted (e.g., some of the substance remains in a vial, tube, or syringe after administration but cannot or may not be further utilized), shall be properly recorded in accordance with §1304.22(c), and such record need not be maintained on a DEA Form 41.
$4.5 million civil penalty—November 2021: The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center failed to properly report the “dispensing and wasting of controlled substances—an essential safeguard against diversion—and made errors in forms documenting the ordering, receipt, and distribution of controlled substances—all violations of the CSA.”
Title 21 CFR Part 1301.76 Other Security Controls for Practitioners indicates the Registrant shall notify the DEA Field Division Office of the Administration in their area, in writing, of the theft or significant loss of any controlled substances within one business day of discovery of such loss or theft. The Registrant shall also complete and submit the DEA Form 106 regarding the loss or theft to the Field Division Office in their area.
$7.75 million civil penalty—January 2021: According to the DEA, McLaren Health Care Corporation failed to notify the DEA of known employee thefts of controlled substances. “These violations, the government claimed, stemmed in part from certain facility policies that were inconsistent with the CSA’s requirements and MHCC’s failure to revise other legacy policies that remained in place after MHCC acquired corporate health care providers.”
$1 million civil penalty—April 2022: The United States alleges that Prisma Health Midlands “failed to notify the DEA within one business day regarding thefts or significant losses of controlled substances over a three-year time period. As a DEA registrant, Prisma has certain record keeping and reporting obligations and one of these is to promptly notify the DEA whenever a theft or significant loss occurs.”
The DEA Pharmacist’s Manual (2022 edition) indicates that the inventory records of Schedule II controlled substances must be kept separate from all other records of the pharmacy and that the records for Schedules III, IV, and V controlled substances must be maintained either separately from all other records of the pharmacy or in such format that the information required is readily retrievable from the pharmacy’s ordinary business records.
The DEA Pharmacist’s Manual (2022 edition) also indicates that “inventory” is a complete and accurate list of all stocks and forms of controlled substances in the possession of the registrant on the date the inventory is taken as determined by an actual physical count for Schedule II controlled substances and shall be maintained in written, typewritten, or printed form at the registered location. With respect to inventories of a schedule III, IV, or V controlled substance, the registrant may, with respect to an open bottle that contains no more than 1,000 tablets, make an estimated count or measure of the contents, unless the container holds more than 1,000 tablets or capsules in which case an exact count of the contents must be made.
Title 21 CFR Part 1304.11 (a) indicates the controlled substance inventory may be taken either as of opening of business or as of the close of business on the inventory date and that it shall be indicated on the inventory.
$1.9 million civil penalty—December 2022: Northeast Hospital Corp. agreed to pay civil penalties to resolve allegations it violated the CSA by failing to keep accurate records of controlled substances and that “based on DEA’s audit of the controlled substances that Northeast had on site, Northeast’s actual controlled substances inventory differed from what its records showed should be present.”
$250,000 civil penalty—August 2023: Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, Inc. agreed to pay the United States $250,000 to resolve allegations that the company “violated the Controlled Substances Act by failing to maintain records required by the CSA.” The United States determined that “Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, Inc. committed 176 violations of the CSA, including failing to take a new inventory of all controlled substances on hand at least once every two years, failing to maintain records of the number of units acquired from other persons, and failing to notify the DEA of a theft or loss within one business day of the discovery.”
The settlement examples above offer significant reminders of the importance of compliance with DEA regulations. The costs to not only your organization’s finances but to your organization’s reputation as a trustworthy operation are great.
For more information on DEA regulations or how Kodiak can assist you with your compliance program, please reach out to our compliance experts. Don’t miss part 2 of this article, which will cover DEA regulations and settlements related to physical security controls, diversion reporting and monitoring, drug testing, and dispensing.
Get access to our communications, including our Healthcare Connection newsletter, to tap into industry trends, CPE webinars, and more.